Educationwashing: Cambridge University and the UAE's use of education to obscure human rights problems

Educationwashing: Cambridge University and the UAE's use of education to obscure human rights problems
A landscape photo of Cambridge University

ImpACT International for Human Rights Policies voices concern that the University of Cambridge will renew its currently on hold plans to form closer links with the government of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Many human rights campaigners, including ImpACT international, call on the University of Cambridge to rule out any deal with the UAE until such time as the emirate conforms to acceptable international human rights norms and implements our recommendations. If change is not forthcoming then the proposal for collaboration between the university and the country must be cancelled.[1]

If indeed the £400 million deal is revived it would mean that there is a danger that the University of Cambridge would invent a whole new way in which regimes can deflect and distract from their poor human rights record. This can be labelled ‘Educationwashing’, specifically this would in practice mean using education to obscure unethical interests and human rights problems.

The high superb academic standards that the University of Cambridge embodies can only be protected and enhanced if students, graduates, and staff, have the right not to be censored, nor subject to state surveillance and human rights abuses.

As education establishments, including Cambridge, consider their past links to be inappropriate they seem willing to engage with regimes with dubious human rights records. The links the University of Cambridge is trying to forge with the UAE could easily become chains for the people in that country. The UAE and Cambridge must not become complicit in educationwashing. It would be absurd and perilous for the partnership to proceed. A British academic institution that claims high principles cannot put mammon above its morals.

Furthermore, the high superb academic standards that the University of Cambridge embodies can only be protected and enhanced if students, graduates, and staff, have the right not to be censored, nor subject to state surveillance and human rights abuses. They must also be free from political and religious persecution before and after their graduation. Education and research can only reach its full potential and be effective and productive if it is impartial, free from censorship, and state intrusion. Individuals must be free from persecution and able to think and talk without fear. Only in that environment can people excel and reach their full potential.

ImpACT International calls on the University of Cambridge to completely rule out a deal with the UAE. The university must also build upon its existing protocols and principles by which potential partnerships are evaluated. These are currently limited to requiring that international partnerships must:

  1. Protect our people in their international engagement.
  1. Defend academic freedom.
  1. Promote and support an academic culture of vigilance and awareness of these risks, and ensure that people are equipped to know how to minimise or mitigate them.
  1. Protect the open flow of ideas, data and other forms of intellectual property – including a duty to protect it against wrongful exploitation or interference
  1. Safeguard the University’s funding autonomy – including a duty to ensure the diversity and transparency of our funding sources.[2]

Those five requirements are a step forward but pay little heed to issues other than those which directly relate to the University’s business interests. Those that must endure human rights abuses do not feature in Cambridge’s concerns, what is more their plight will only be worsened by educationwashing.

Clearly, as the arrangement with the UAE is still possible, Cambridge’s economic interests are being put ahead of ethical considerations. It is feared that Cambridge will later confirm arrangements with the UAE just as it is also exploring deals with other regimes around the globe. Considering this and the potential reputational damage that it could do to British higher education, whilst rewarding iniquitous regimes, the university should adopt more substantial recommendations that will prevent this and other unfortunate scenarios from emerging in the future. Freedom should not be a for a select few that are lucky enough to be associated with the University of Cambridge.

Citizens in a state in which the University of Cambridge is negotiating a partnership, as well as students, graduates, and staff, must have the right not to be censored. They must also be free from spyware software and other mechanisms that are used to monitor and police the political opinions of UAE residents. British universities must demand that any state or territory in which they operate, or are seeking investment from, should immediately ceases use of surveillance against political dissidents, allow for freedom of speech, enshrine legal protections that guarantee press freedom, and commit to a process of human rights reforms and democratisation. Ethical education needs to be the new maxim for British education abroad as well as at home.

Download full letter here đź”»


Related

Legal Framework for Establishing of Human Rights Groups in Saudi Arab...

Saudi government frequently bans meetings and closes down associations

Companies must investigate supply chains and boycott businesses compl...

The list of 112 companies that do business in illegal Israeli settlements—released this week by a high U.N. official—should become a guide to who to black...

Guidance for business: Preserving human rights while combating COVID-...

As health and government officials work relentlessly to curb the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) around the world, businesses also must do thei...